Lands End Mens 800 Down Packable Jacket Review
It's tough to beat out a keen downwards jacket, whether it's for coincidental utilise or violent around the backcountry. This cozy insulation type offers the best warmth-to-weight ratio on the market and packs downward smaller than synthetics for easy storage. Below are the best down jackets of 2022, including leading down sweaters, ultralight models, and winter-weight designs for cold weather. You'll discover a good for you range of options from budget choices to specialized alpine pieces for serious adventures. For more than background data on warmth, weight, denier and more than, see our downwardly jacket comparison table and ownership advice below the picks.
Our Team'southward Down Jacket Picks
- Best Overall Down Jacket: Patagonia Downward Sweater
- Best Ultralight Downward Jacket: Mountain Hardwear Ghost Whisperer/two Hoody
- Best Upkeep Downward Jacket: REI Co-op 650 Downward Jacket ii.0
- Best Heavyweight Downward Jacket: Outdoor Inquiry Super Alpine Downwardly Parka
- Best Downward Jacket for Everyday Apply:Patagonia Silent Down Jacket
All-time Overall Down Jacket
1. Patagonia Downwardly Sweater ($229)
Category: Lightweight
Weight: 13.1 oz.
Fill: three.4 oz. of 800-fill-ability down
What we like: Extremely versatile and looks great.
What we don't: A chip heavy for backcountry utilize.
The down jacket market place ranges from performance to casual and everything in between, just yous won't find a more versatile choice than the Patagonia Down Sweater. With iii.four ounces of 800-fill-power down, the jacket is light and packable enough for backpacking and travel yet offers enough warmth to utilise as a midlayer for skiing. In addition, it looks great for everyday use—few outdoor companies tin can friction match Patagonia in crossover appeal. And we can't assistance but love the build quality. Of all of the brands nosotros've tested, Patagonia jackets consistently last longer and stop up winning us over with their longevity.
What are the shortcomings of the Down Sweater? At simply over 13 ounces, it's a far cry from ultralight and you tin shave significant weight with a number of the more backcountry-centric options below. Moreover, the fit isn't as tailored as some of the performance designs on this listing (the upside is that layering either over tiptop or underneath is piece of cake, which isn't the case with some technical pieces). Lastly, Patagonia products don't come cheap, although again, nosotros love the sleek styling and you should get a very good for you lifespan out of this jacket...Read in-depth review
See the Men's Patagonia Downwardly Sweater Run into the Women'due south Patagonia Down Sweater
Best Ultralight Down Jacket
2. Mountain Hardwear Ghost Whisperer/2 Hoody ($325)
Category: Ultralight
Weight: 8.viii oz.
Fill: 3 oz. of 800-fill-power down
What we similar: Incredible warmth for the weight and good feature ready.
What nosotros don't: Fit is a flake indigestible; not-elasticized cuffs don't exercise a great chore at sealing out the common cold.
A couple seasons ago, Mount Hardwear revamped one of the original ultralight down jackets: its pop Ghost Whisperer. Now the "ii," the latest model features a pocket-sized increase in weight (about 1 oz. for the men'due south hoody) but comes with a number of notable upgrades. To start, there'southward a piffling more 800-fill down stuffed inside, and the recycled shell is a fleck thicker, which translate to modest increases in warmth and durability. Only the jacket stays true to its roots with excellent packability and a simply phenomenal warmth-to-weight ratio, while including of import features like zippered hand pockets, a hem aligning, and decent wind and water resistance. For fast-and-lite missions, the Ghost Whisperer/two remains a go-to option.
Unfortunately, two elements that accept not changed with the Ghost Whisperer/2 are its fit and cuff pattern. Different the tailored cut that y'all get from Arc'teryx Cerium LT or Feathered Friends Eos, the Mount Hardwear is boxy and awkwardly big in the trunk. It yet layers reasonably well nether a shell, merely we're surprised they haven't given it a ameliorate performance fit considering its intended use. Further, the cuffs are loose and don't provide a very solid seal, which can let cold air sneak through unless yous throw on a pair of gloves. Despite these nitpicks, the rebooted Ghost Whisperer is very light, warm, and a favorite among serious outdoor adventurers...Read in-depth review
See the Men'due south MH Ghost Whisperer Run across the Women's MH Ghost Whisperer
Best Budget Down Jacket
3. REI Co-op 650 Down Jacket 2.0 ($100)
Category: Lightweight
Weight: 11 oz.
Fill: 4.ii oz. of 650-fill-power downwards
What we like: Fantastic price for a well-rounded, lightweight design.
What nosotros don't: No hem adjustment (men's version).
REI's original 650 Down Jacket was our top upkeep pick for years, and their latest "2.0" sticks to the winning formula. The jacket is reasonably calorie-free at 11 ounces, provides solid warmth with over 4 ounces of 650-fill-power down, and stuffs into its own manus pocket. REI honed in the design for the newer version by calculation recycled shell fabric, box-like baffling, and a nice variety of good-looking colorways. Importantly, they didn't change the price by much (it went upward by 45 cents), which easily undercuts competitors similar the Outdoor Research Coldfront beneath by over $100. For daily use, travel, low-cal adventuring, and as a midlayer for resort skiing, y'all only won't notice a better bargain.
Budget-oriented products almost always come up with compromises, and REI'due south Downwardly Jacket 2.0 does fall short for serious performance use. The 650-fill down isn't quite every bit warm or compressible as the 800-fill Patagonia Down Sweater to a higher place, and the standard nylon shell isn't as durable as the ripstop constructions you become on more expensive alternatives. In addition, the REI lacks a hem adjustment, which is limiting for dialing in fit (the hem is fairly stretchy, withal). Just circling back to value, the 650 Downwards Jacket'south combination of warmth, build quality, and price are but unmatched (we fifty-fifty dedicated an article to breaking down why we think the REI is the all-time inexpensive downward jacket currently on the market). For a pace upward in performance from the Co-op, check out their Stratocloud Downwardly Hoodie ($189)...Read in-depth review
Meet the Men's REI 650 Downwards Jacket Meet the Women'southward REI 650 Down Jacket
Best Heavyweight Down Jacket for the Cold
iv. Outdoor Enquiry Super Alpine Down Parka ($399)
Category: Heavyweight
Weight: 1 lb. 13.one oz.
Fill: 8.ane oz. of 800-fill-power down
What we like: Parka-length coverage, water-resistant beat, and lots of loft.
What nosotros don't: Heavier than nigh heavyweight down jackets.
For cold-atmospheric condition climbing, frigid nights of winter camping, or every bit an extra layer during ski transitions, there's no friction match for the security of a heavyweight downwards jacket. These jackets are epitomized by their sleeping-bag-like loft, alpine and protective collars, and longer cut. Because they're meant to exist worn as an outer layer (you lot'd exist hard-pressed to squeeze a hardshell overtop such a lofty slice), heavyweight downwardly jackets also feature a durable, water-resistant shell and handy extras similar internal stash pockets, which are dandy for storing skins or keeping your climbing shoes warm. It doesn't get much amend for all-out warmth, and our current favorite is the Outdoor Research Super Alpine Downwards Parka.
Checking in at $399, the Super Alpine features a weather-resistant Pertex Quantum Pro shell (30D), generous 33.5-inch back length, and viii ounces of premium 800-make full down, which is over twice as much insulation every bit the Patagonia Down Sweater above. In terms of features, y'all get a fleece-lined collar and pockets, helmet-uniform hood, and a range of storage. Keep in listen that the Super Alpine is heavy compared to similar jackets—Rab's more affordable Neutrino Pro (largely unavailable at the time of publishing) weighs 8 ounces less for only every bit much insulation; and for a big step upwards in cost, the Patagonia Form Seven ($899) and Arc'teryx Blastoff Parka ($999) are too warmer and lighter. But the OR is the most well-rounded heavyweight parka for its combination of warmth, price, and availability, with all the performance most wintertime adventurers need.
Meet the Men's Outdoor Enquiry Super Alpine See the Women'south Outdoor Inquiry Super Alpine
Best Downward Jacket for Everyday Employ
v. Patagonia Silent Down Jacket ($279)
Category: Calorie-free/midweight
Weight: one lb. four.7 ounces
Fill: 3.ix oz. of 700-fill up-power downward
What we like: Extremely soft and cozy design that excels for everyday wear.
What we don't: Non a backcountry-ready slice.
Virtually of the down jackets here are intended for backcountry use, only there'due south a time and place for a dedicated everyday jacket that prioritizes comfort and looks over all-out functioning. Enter the Silent Downwardly, which has a decidedly casual camber. With this jacket, you get a healthy amount of 700-fill-power downward, a truly luxurious polyester beat and lining (seventy% recycled), and very clean styling that is a far weep from the more technical-looking models here. In addition, the trounce minimizes the "swish-swish" sound mutual among down pieces (hence the name), and the hood can be zipped into the neckband when non in utilise (a handy feature when layering under a shell). For everyday winter and shoulder-season wearable, the Silent Down is another strong option from Patagonia.
As we touched on above, the main limitation of the Silent Down is its casually focused build. The soft fabric prioritizes stretchiness and a plush hand experience over packability, and its taffeta construction doesn't inspire a lot of confidence effectually precipitous equipment (it seems pretty piece of cake to tear). Further, the jacket is on the heavy end of the spectrum at well over ane pound, and it doesn't include a stuff sack or pocket. Simply these are easy tradeoffs considering its intended utilize, and the Silent Down strikes us as the kind of jacket you'll want to catch every mean solar day for months on end (we certainly did). For a similar casual option with even more down fill for frigid temperatures, check out Patagonia'south Jackson Glacier or the parka-length version of Mountain Hardwear'southward Stretchdown below…Read in-depth review
See the Men'due south Patagonia Silent Down See the Women's Patagonia Silent Down
Best of the Rest
6. Arc'teryx Cerium LT Hoody ($379)
Category: Lite/ultralight
Weight: x.8 oz.
Fill up: 3.6 oz. of 850-fill-ability down; 80g & 100g Coreloft
What we similar: Serious functioning chops; premium look and feel.
What we don't: Expensive and slim fit isn't for everyone.
Oh, the beauty of Arc'teryx products. They generally cost the most, look the best, and perform well plenty for seasoned adventurers to put them through the wringer on a consistent footing. The Cerium LT Hoody is the company'due south leading lightweight down jacket and ane sleek piece of gear. With a full weight of ten.8 ounces, a almost complete feature set, a silky interior and exterior, and a very make clean design overall, the Cerium LT plays and looks the role. We also like the use of Down Blended Mapping, which includes synthetic insulation in areas decumbent to getting wet. While most jackets on this listing are strictly downwards, Arc'teryx has created a really overnice balance of lightweight warmth and functionality.
The most common knock against Arc'teryx products is price. At $379, the Cerium LT is a full $150 more than our meridian-ranked Down Sweater, which will get the job washed for all merely the most discerning users. In addition, the fit is on the slim/able-bodied side, which can be nifty for performance use just won't piece of work for everyone and limits how much you can layer underneath. And if you're going to hand over this much cash, it'due south worth considering the Feathered Friends Eos below, which has more than down, a higher fill power at 900, and weighs slightly less. Just all gripes aside, the Cerium is an exceptionally well-congenital slice of gear, looks bully (we oft get compliments when wearing information technology effectually town), and can more handle its own in the backcountry...Read in-depth review
Meet the Men'due south Arc'teryx Cerium LT Meet the Women's Arc'teryx Cerium LT
7. Outdoor Inquiry Coldfront Downwardly Hoodie ($229)
Category: Midweight
Weight: 1 lb. 4.7 oz.
Fill up: v.3 oz. of 700-fill up-power down & 150g VerticalX ECO
What we like: Comfy, classy, and well-priced for what you go.
What nosotros don't: Doesn't pack downward nearly equally small as more premium options.
Outdoor Inquiry jackets aren't always the highest-quality or near technical on the market place, but they are some of the best values. The new Coldfront Down Hoodie carries the torch: at $229, it'southward a considerable step downwards in price from the more premium options on this list but doesn't fall as well far behind in terms of performance. Warmth is quite impressive with 5.3 ounces of 700-fill up down, plus you get more weather condition-gear up VerticalX ECO synthetic insulation at the shoulders and cuffs. We also love the soft-still-rugged shell and nice touches like fleece-lined handwarmer pockets, snug-fitting gage gaiters with thumb loops, and classy branding on the sleeve. For everyday use and casual winter adventuring, the Coldfront is a very well-rounded option.
It's worth noting that the Coldfront replaces Outdoor Enquiry's well-loved Transcendent just differs in a few central ways. Near notably, OR upped the fill ability from 650 to 700 and added 1.i ounces more down, merely the addition of constructed fill and a more durable vanquish (30D vs. the Transcendent's 20D) increased full weight past more than iv ounces, which is significant. That said, neither jacket is a truthful performance slice, so this doesn't necessarily alter the equation for u.s.a., and we capeesh the Coldfront's tougher exterior for both front- and backcountry use. It doesn't pack down equally pocket-size as the higher-fill-power options above and below, but considering the price and warmth, it'south all most people need in a down jacket.
Meet the Men's Outdoor Research Coldfront See the Women's Outdoor Research Coldfront
eight. REI Co-op Stormhenge Downwardly Hybrid ($259)
Category: Heavyweight
Weight: 1 lb. xv.8 oz.
Make full: 850-fill-power down; 180g & 80g synthetic
What we like: Waterproof and very warm.
What we don't: Heavier and bulkier than a typical downward jacket; boxy fit at the hips/waist.
REI isn't known for pushing the boundaries of jacket pattern, but we really like what they've done with the Stormhenge Downwardly Hybrid. Updated for the 2022 wintertime flavour, this popular jacket at present features a mix of premium 850-fill downwards and synthetic insulation in areas prone to getting wet (this concept is reminiscent of Arc'teryx'southward torso mapping that the loftier-end Canadian make has incorporated for years). And the real kicker: a fully waterproof two-layer trounce, which is a rarity in the downward jacket globe, along with overnice touches similar pit zips to regulate heat. Unfortunately, REI does non provide the make full weight, only the Stormhenge should exist one of the warmest options on this list. For reference, we were comfortable wearing the previous model over a thin baselayer down into the low 20s Fahrenheit.
The Stormhenge Down Hybrid'south unique waterproof structure helps information technology stand up out amidst other winter-set up downwardly jackets like the OR Super Alpine above and Patagonia Fitz Roy below. Both of those models have water-resistant shells and DWR treatments simply autumn well brusque of the REI in terms of weatherproofing. Notwithstanding, the Stormhenge is the heaviest jacket on our listing at nearly ii pounds (adding synthetic insulation made it even heavier) and doesn't pack down very small. Every bit a result, it's lacking in versatility for uses like backpacking or climbing. We besides found the shape to exist fairly boxy, with a good amount of extra room at the hips and waist. But if the fit works for y'all, the Stormhenge'south waterproofing and warm build brand it viable for everything from everyday winter use to downhill skiing...Read in-depth review
Run into the Men'due south REI Stormhenge Down Hybrid See the Women's REI Stormhenge Hybrid
9. Mountain Hardwear Stretchdown Hoody ($275)
Category: Low-cal/midweight
Weight: one lb. 4.5 oz.
Fill: iv.iii oz. of 700-fill-power down
What we similar: Super comfortable and one of the all-time-looking jackets on this listing.
What nosotros don't: Pricey for a coincidental piece.
Mountain Hardwear launched its Stretchdown line a handful of years ago, epitomized by soft and stretchy shells and welded seams (rather than stitched baffles). The goal here was to combine the insulation of down with the range of motion, durability, and comfort of a softshell—and we'd say Mountain Hardwear pulled it off pretty well. The jacket's knit fabric is very tough, and the stretchiness gives it a plush feel that you typically don't get from a down piece. Tack on some clean styling—even the logo is understated—and the Stretchdown is a practical and proficient-looking jacket for everyday apply.
But similar the Patagonia Silent Downwards above, the performance chops of the Stretchdown are limited: The 700-fill-ability downwardly has less loft than the true backcountry pieces on this list, and the jacket is bulky and heavy for the amount of warmth you get. Further, $275 is no small price for a casual particular (you can relieve with the REI 650 above or Cotopaxi below), and some volition appreciate the even more casual appearance of the Silent Downward. Finally, we have noticed that the Stretchdown's fabric has a tendency to concord stains, and the rubberband in our cuffs has grown tired over time. But we have a soft spot for this jacket (no pun intended), which receives compliments almost every fourth dimension we get out. It'due south besides worth noting that Mountain Hardwear offers a number of versions of the Stretchdown, including a heavyweight parka (1 of our tester's get-to jackets for everyday wintertime utilize).
See the Men's Mountain Hardwear Stretchdown Meet the Women's Mountain Hardwear Stretchdown
10. Feathered Friends Eos ($389)
Category: Light/ultralight
Weight: 10.8 oz.
Fill: iii.vii oz. of 900-fill up-power downward
What we like: Superb build quality and warmth-to-weight ratio.
What nosotros don't:Expensive and streamlined styling isn't for anybody.
Feathered Friends doesn't do splashy marketing campaigns like other gear brands, only this downwardly specialist gets a whole lot of respect among the tall community (if y'all're in Seattle, the shop is across from the REI flagship and makes for a fun visit). Hither'south what yous get from Feathered Friends: premium construction (including some of the highest-fill-power downwardly on the market), local manufacturing in Seattle or Vancouver, and a decently competitive cost given that they only sell their products in-firm. Their performance-oriented lineup of jackets ranges from lightweight designs to heavyweight trek-grade parkas, and the Eos stands out as the virtually approachable choice for the masses. With an impressive three.vii ounces of 900-fill downwards in a 10.8-ounce build, it offers more warmth for the weight than simply almost any jacket here.
So why isn't the Eos ranked higher? For one, the jacket is congenital for operation, and the streamlined fit and feature set aren't quite every bit appealing for daily wear as competitors like the Arc'teryx Cerium LT or Patagonia Downwards Sweater above (that said, a recent update tacks on an exterior zip pocket and adaptable hood, making the Eos more functional than always). 2d, the jacket is pricey at $389, which puts it in the same price range every bit mid and heavyweight offerings like the Patagonia Fitz Roy and OR Super Alpine. And a final consideration is availability: Even in normal years (Covid notwithstanding), in that location tin be a delay before the jacket ships out. Just if you're willing to await, the Eos is i of the best performing downwardly jackets on the market for weight-conscious climbers, skiers, and more...Read in-depth review
Run across the Men's Feathered Friends Eos See the Women'southward Feathered Friends Eos
11. Norrøna Falketind Down750 Hood ($299)
Category: Lightweight
Weight: fifteen.7 oz.
Fill: three.5 oz. of 750-fill up-power downward; synthetic
What we like: Thoughtful design boosts weather resistance and durability.
What we don't: Heavy and limited storage.
Norrøna might not be on everyone's radar, but the Norwegian company has a serious lineup of outerwear built for performance employ. Their Falketind Down750 is a lightweight down jacket that has served u.s.a. well both equally a cold-conditions midlayer (worn underneath a hardshell) and standalone piece in milder conditions. A number of features set information technology apart from other jackets here, including body-mapped insulation—the down fill is centered largely around the core, while synthetic make full is used in exposed areas for added durability and weather protection—and fabric reinforcements (45D) at the shoulders and lower artillery for abrasion resistance. Nosotros wore the Falketind Down750 for a winter of travel (including a 16-day trek in Nepal and backcountry skiing in BC), and information technology proved itself a capable companion in fall and winter conditions.
That said, we do have a few minor gripes with the Falketind Down750's design. Starting time off, both of our handwarmer pockets have stitching on the inside that reduces the usable area past a sizable margin (nosotros undid the stitches in one pocket but our handiwork resulted in a damaged attachment). Second, the jacket lacks interior storage (nosotros appreciate dump pockets for storing skins or climbing shoes), and the hand pockets' low placement makes them inaccessible under our backpack'southward hip chugalug. Finally, the Norrøna is heavier than much of the lightweight competition (yous tin can go comparable warmth for almost 5 oz. less with the Eos above), although many volition consider this a fair trade for the added water resistance and immovability. Added up, the Falketind Down750 is a hardwearing and thoughtfully designed down jacket with the summit-notch build quality nosotros've come to expect from Norrøna... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Norrøna Falketind Down750 Run into the Women'due south Norrøna Falketind Down750
12. Patagonia Fitz Roy Downward Hoody ($399)
Category: Midweight
Weight: 1 lb. 1.1 oz.
Fill: 5.6 oz. of 800-fill-ability down
What nosotros like: Warmer and more characteristic-rich than the Downward Sweater.
What nosotros don't: More than expensive than the Lightline Eco below and with less down.
For a step up in warmth from the Patagonia Downwardly Sweater above, the Fitz Roy Down Hoody takes the aforementioned quality and sleek pattern simply is built for colder wintertime weather. In terms of insulation, you lot become approximately 5.6 ounces of 800-make full-ability down forth with a Pertex Quantum shell for moisture protection. The jacket has small baffles that resemble a puffed-upwardly Downwardly Sweater, and the 20-denier shell material is roughly the aforementioned strength. The Fitz Roy, withal, offers significantly more warmth while the Down Sweater is designed more for shoulder seasons and layering. It's worth noting that 5.half-dozen ounces of down fill is less than the slightly cheaper OR Super Alpine higher up (8.1 oz.), which hurts the Fitz Roy in our rankings.
In many ways, the Patagonia Fitz Roy Hoody is a hybrid performance/casual piece. It has some advanced features like a helmet-compatible hood and elasticized cuffs that do a skilful job staying out of your fashion during physical action. Simply the jacket still looks the part for metropolis clothing in the colder months, making information technology a nice option for just about any blazon of wintertime employ (although nosotros've plant the beat on other versions of the Fitz Roy gets muddy and stains pretty hands). That said, while nosotros appreciate Patagonia build quality and styling, $400 is a lot to pay for this much down, and we prefer the warmer and cheaper OR...Read in-depth review
See the Men's Patagonia Fitz Roy Run across the Women'south Patagonia Fitz Roy
13. Rab Cubit Stretch Downwardly Hoody ($300)
Category: Midweight
Weight: 1 lb. iii.nine oz.
Fill up: 6.1 oz. of 700-fill-ability downwardly
What we like: Warm, stylish, and a real standout in terms of comfort.
What we don't: Pricey and falls short of true performance pieces in weight and packability.
Stretch-woven shells are a new trend in downward jackets, and Rab recently threw their chapeau into the ring with the Cubit Stretch Down Hoody. Similar the Mountain Hardwear Stretchdown above, the Cubit features a soft and pliable shell by way of Pertex's 3D Weave Technology, along with welded baffles to keep insulation in place without the demand for stitches. And information technology ups the ante in terms of warmth, with 6.1 ounces of 700-fill downwards compared to the Stretchdown'south 4.3 ounces. In fact, the first fourth dimension we put on the Cubit, we were struck by its loft, which felt on par with a jacket like the Patagonia Fitz Roy above. And as we've come to expect from Rab, build quality is splendid with a high attention to item.
A strong argument can be made for the Rab Cubit over the Stretchdown. Yous get a bit more operation with the Rab, including a weather-resistant Pertex crush with durable water repellent finish, hydrophobic downwardly, and more warmth for less weight overall. The jacket's shortcomings are similar: the Cubit'due south bulk and heft have it out of the running for weight-conscious missions, and $300 is expensive for a casual down jacket. But while we've found the quality of Rab's outerwear to be superior to that of Mountain Hardwear, the Stretchdown's design and colorway options are especially special and centre-catching, which is what most people are looking for in an everyday piece. But the Rab is withal a warm, comfortable, and durable downwardly jacket, slap-up for apply effectually town and casual backcountry outings (we beloved to vesture it to the crag).
Run across the Men'south Rab Cubit Stretch Down Hoody See the Women's Cubit Stretch Down Hoody
14. Fjallraven Expedition Pack ($275)
Category: Lightweight
Weight: 1 lb. i.three oz.
Make full: 3.9 oz. of 700-fill-ability downwardly & synthetic
What we like: High-end look and feel; athletic fit.
What nosotros don't: Heavier than the lightweight competition.
Swedish brand Fjallraven does a nice job of marrying premium blueprint with functioning, as evidenced by their Expedition Pack down jacket. We'll starting time by noting that yous don't get the 800-fill up-power downwardly or college that brands like Arc'teryx or Patagonia offer, but for casual use and done-in-a-day adventures, it'due south a quality option. The jacket has a healthy corporeality of 700-fill up downwards for warmth, synthetic insulation in the shoulders for extra weather resistance and toughness, a terrific hood, and an athletic fit that is less baggy than many options on this list. All in all, nosotros like the premium looks and versatility of the Expedition Pack.
In terms of competitors, the Fjallraven offers a similar level of warmth as of our summit picks like the Patagonia Down Sweater and Arc'teryx Cerium LT higher up, merely it's not quite every bit lite or packable, limiting its backcountry entreatment. This said, we appreciate the immovability of Fjallraven products in general, and the constructed insulation in the shoulders makes wearing a pack for extended periods more feasible (it'southward a prissy option for hiking and snowshoeing). And there's no denying the Trek Pack's coziness, attention to detail, and good looks, which are a attestation to the brand'south overall expertise. Finally, for those interested in using the Expedition Pack equally a midlayer, Fjallraven makes a non-hooded version for $250... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Fjallraven Expedition Pack See the Women's Expedition Pack
15. Mount Equipment Lightline Eco ($325)
Category: Heavyweight
Weight: 1 lb. 12.9 oz.
Fill: 10.iv oz. of 700-fill-ability downwards
What nosotros like: Super warm and tough, looks expert, and a dandy value.
What we don't: Lower fill power than the more premium options.
There is a lot to similar about the Lightline Eco jacket from Mount Equipment. Offset, it has the highest fill weight on this list at 10.4 ounces of 700-fill up down, which makes it a corking selection for seriously cold atmospheric condition (and earns it a spot in our circular-up of best winter jackets). Second, it offers excellent protection from the elements with a windproof and water-resistant Drilite vanquish that's besides the thickest hither at 50 denier. Third, we actually similar the Lightline's clean looks—it's a nice choice for everything from technical utilize to everyday wear in cold climates. And terminal merely not to the lowest degree, it'due south a great value at $325, especially considering many jackets with a fraction of the down cost more.
How does the Mountain Equipment Lightline Eco compare to other cold-conditions jackets on this list? The 700-make full duck downward is respectable but falls brusk of beingness ultra-premium, and therefore the jacket doesn't offering quite equally much warmth for the weight as an choice like the 800-fill OR Super Alpine above. It also won't compress downward quite as easily for its size (the burly shell fabric plays a big part here), although 700-fill down even so does pretty well in this regard. All told, if you're willing to sacrifice a fiddling on make full power, the Lightline is warm, versatile, looks neat, and won't suspension the bank.
Encounter the Men's Mountain Equipment Lightline Eco
16. Rab Microlight Alpine Jacket ($280)
Category: Light/midweight
Weight: i lb. one oz.
Fill: 5 oz. of 750-make full-power down
What nosotros like: A prissy level of warmth with a water-resistant build.
What we don't: A tad heavy for the backcountry.
Rab'south popular Microlight Alpine Jacket pays tribute to the brand'south climbing heritage. To start, information technology'south congenital to handle current of air and light wet thanks to a tough Pertex Quantum shell, DWR coating, and hydrophobic down. Farther, we found the rigid structure of the jacket's wire-brimmed hood has a hardshell-similar feel, offering cracking all-around coverage and protection. You'll still want to don a waterproof layer if the skies open up, but the Microlight Tall stands out as one of the more weather condition-resistant midweight down jackets we've tested.
Packing 5 ounces of 750-fill-power downwardly in a men's big, the Rab is warmer than competitors like Patagonia's Down Sweater Hoody (three.7 ounces of 800-fill up down) and Feathered Friends' Eos (three.7 ounces of 900-fill downwards). Only similar the Feathered Friends, it can't match the Patagonia in terms of everyday appeal. The jacket's slim fit is polarizing (specially in the men's version), and the European-style left-hand zipper takes some getting used to. And for hauling in a pack, it's on the heavy side at 1 pound ane ounces, just that extra weight does come with a boost in insulation. Overall, we think the Rab's combination of warmth, weather resistance, and reasonable $280 price go far a well-rounded backcountry piece...Read in-depth review
See the Men'due south Rab Microlight Alpine See the Women's Rab Microlight Alpine
17. Arc'teryx Thorium AR ($325)
Category: Low-cal/midweight
Weight: i lb 1.iii oz.
Make full: 4.6 oz. of 700-fill-ability downward; 80g & 140g Coreloft
What we similar: Thicker shell fabric than the Cerium LT above and a bit more than warmth.
What we don't: Decently heavy for a down jacket.
The Arc'teryx Cerium LT above is an ultralight backcountry piece with a thin 10-denier shell, but that doesn't come without sacrifices. For a bit less of a specialized down jacket from Arc'teryx, the Thorium AR is considerably more durable with a thirty-denier trounce, has more down (although it uses 700-fill up-power down instead of 850), and costs $50 less. For all types of outdoor activities including everyday use around boondocks, the Thorium arguably is the more than versatile option and one that you won't have to worry almost every bit much.
The most notable downsides of the Thorium AR come up with the increased weight and size. At just over 1 pound, it's less attractive for uses like backpacking and climbing when every ounce counts, and it won't pack down as small every bit the Cerium. As well, keep in listen that Arc'teryx jackets have a very athletic fit in general, and given that the Thorium oftentimes is used as a midlayer, you may want to size up if you are on the argue. But with a impact more warmth than the Cerium LT and a more hardwearing build for less money, there is a lot to like about the Thorium...Read in-depth review
Run across the Men's Arc'teryx Thorium AR Run into the Women's Arc'teryx Thorium AR
18. Cotopaxi Fuego ($250)
Category: Lightweight
Weight: fourteen oz.
Make full: 800-fill-power downwards
What we like: Retro styling with premium down fill.
What nosotros don't: Materials aren't very soft; not anybody likes the striped colorways.
Many down jacket brands keep their styling adequately close to the cuff, simply Cotopaxi stands out with its fun, retro designs. The Utah make'south leading down jacket is the Fuego, which gets you premium 800-fill down (nosotros were unable to runway down the fill weight from the company), along with a versatile 20-denier shell that is reasonably tough while go on weight down. Of form, the retro styling is what stands out most and Cotopaxi currently is offering the jacket in nine colorways, all simply one with the signature multi-colored baffles on the forepart. Throw in responsibly sourced downwardly and the fact that Cotopaxi is a certified B Corp, and the Fuego is an easy jacket to get behind.
In terms of competitors, Patagonia's Downwardly Sweater uses the same 800-fill down and has a slightly thicker 20 ten 30-denier vanquish only is 1 ounce heavier and costs $279 (without make full weight, it'southward hard to make a more exacting comparison). The biggest reason we rank the Cotopaxi here is material quality: the Fuego has a noticeably plasticky and slippery feel, especially when held up against pricier options similar the Patagonia, which is much softer by comparison. But the Cotopaxi Fuego hits a nice balance of performance chops, casual appeal, and value, which is why we've included it on our listing...Read in-depth review
See the Men's Cotopaxi Fuego Encounter the Women'due south Cotopaxi Fuego
nineteen. Montbell Plasma chiliad Down Jacket ($329)
Category: Ultralight
Weight: 4.viii oz.
Fill: 1.six oz. of 1,000-make full-power down
What we like: Incredible warmth-to-weight ratio—the best on the market place.
What we don't: Super thin beat material is lacking in durability.
Among serious alpinists, you won't observe an outdoor brand with more street cred than Montbell. This Japan-based company makes gear for those who depend on it, and doesn't spend much on paid athletes or splashy marketing campaigns. But the proof is in the pudding: Montbell makes some of the most well-respected ultralight insulation on the market, and their most unique offering is the Plasma k. With ultra-premium one,000-fill-power down (that is not a misprint) along with a paper-thin 7-denier shell, it'southward by far the lightest down jacket on this list at an incredible 4.viii ounces all-in.
Why isn't the Montbell Plasma g ranked higher? First, the one.half-dozen ounces of downwardly fill is pretty meager—information technology may piece of work for warm-weather backpacking on a road like the Appalachian Trail, simply on its own, may not provide enough insulation even for summer nights in the mountains. 2nd, the seven-denier vanquish is extremely sparse and requires extra care to prevent holes and snags. Concluding but not least, the fit of the jacket felt quite short on united states of america. It's listed as having a 27-inch length down the middle back, merely certainly didn't feel that way in person (the medium was mode too curt while the large was too baggy). Withal, the Plasma is an impressive technological feat, and for the correct person, a fun jacket to accept in your quiver.
See the Men'due south Montbell Plasma grand Encounter the Women'due south Montbell Plasma 1000
Downward Jacket Comparison Table
| Jacket | Price | Weight | Category | Make full Ability | Fill Weight | Denier | Packable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patagonia Down Sweater | $229 | 13.1 oz. | Lightweight | 800 | iii.iv oz. | 20Dx30D | Chest pocket |
| MH Ghost Whisperer | $325 | 8.eight oz. | Ultralight | 800 | 3 oz. | 10Dx10D | Hand pocket |
| REI Co-op 650 Down Jacket | $100 | xi oz. | Lightweight | 650 | 4.2 oz. | 20D | Hand pocket |
| OR Super Alpine | $399 | ane lb. 13.1 oz. | Heavyweight | 800 | 8.one oz. | 30D | Stuff sack |
| Patagonia Silent Downwards | $279 | 1 lb. 4.7 oz. | Low-cal/midweight | 700 | 3.ix oz. | Unavail. | No |
| Arc'teryx Cerium LT Hoody | $379 | 10.8 oz. | Light/ultralight | 850 | 3.vi oz. | 10D | Stuff sack |
| Outdoor Research Coldfront | $229 | ane lb. four.7 oz. | Midweight | 700 | five.3 oz. | 30D | Mitt pocket |
| REI Stormhenge Hybrid | $259 | 1 lb. 15.8 oz. | Heavyweight | 850 | Unavail. | Unavail. | No |
| MTN Hardwear Stretchdown | $275 | one lb. 4.5 oz. | Low-cal/midweight | 700 | 4.3 oz. | Unavail. | No |
| Feathered Friends Eos | $389 | ten.8 oz. | Light/ultralight | 900 | 3.7 oz. | 12Dx20D | Stuff sack |
| Norrøna Falketind Down750 | $299 | xv.vii oz. | Lightweight | 750 | three.5 oz. | 20&45D | Manus pocket |
| Patagonia Fitz Roy | $399 | i lb. 1.1 oz. | Midweight | 800 | five.6 oz. | 20D | Stuff sack |
| Rab Cubit Stretch Downwardly | $300 | 1 lb. 3.9 oz. | Midweight | 700 | 6.1 oz. | Unavail. | No |
| Fjallraven Expedition Pack | $275 | 1 lb. 1.3 oz. | Lightweight | 700 | 3.ix oz. | Unavail. | |
| MTN Equipment Lightline | $325 | 1 lb. 12.9 oz. | Heavyweight | 700 | ten.4 oz. | 50D | No |
| Rab Microlight Tall | $280 | 1 lb. 1 oz. | Calorie-free/midweight | 750 | 5 oz. | 30D | Stuff sack |
| Arc'teryx Thorium AR | $325 | 1 lb. 1.three oz. | Low-cal/midweight | 700 | 4.half dozen oz. | 30D | Stuff sack |
| Cotopaxi Fuego | $250 | fourteen oz. | Lightweight | 800 | Unavail. | 20D | |
| Montbell Plasma 1000 | $329 | 4.8 oz. | Ultralight | 1,000 | ane.6 oz. | 7D | Stuff sack |
Downward Jacket Buying Advice
- Down Jacket Categories
- Warmth
- Fill Power
- Fill up Weight
- Our Estimated Temperature Calibration
- Weight
- Shell Textile Immovability (Denier)
- Compressibility and Packed Size
- Hydrophobic Down and DWR
- Fit
- Hood or No Hood?
- Women's-Specific Down Jackets
- What Most Constructed Jackets?
Down Jacket Categories
Lightweight
The lightweight down jacket category is the industry'southward most popular and what most folks are in the market for. Warmth and wearability are top priorities, and you won't find technical features like helmet-compatible hoods, slim fits, and ultralight shells. But they perform well for everyday utilize, travel, light adventuring, and layering for winter sports. The temperature range for these jackets depends on factors like layering and exertion, just we find that lightweight models are typically suitable for approximately 35 to 50 degrees Fahrenheit (more on this in "Our Estimated Temperature Calibration" below). Leading models include the Patagonia Down Sweater, REI Co-op 650 Downwardly Jacket 2.0, and Cotopaxi Fuego.
.jpg)
Ultralight
Ultralight down jackets are focused pieces designed for backpacking, climbing, backcountry skiing, and other outdoor pursuits where every ounce matters. These down jackets by and large have like fill weights as lightweight down sweaters, but are ultralight due their use of premium down (make full power), sparse shell fabrics (denier), and minimalist zippers and pockets. Interestingly, nosotros frequently encounter this category of down jacket worn every bit daily layers around cities, including the Mountain Hardwear Ghost Whisperer/2 and Arc'teryx Cerium LT (which lands in betwixt the calorie-free and ultralight styles). They are high-quality jackets in general, and if yous are willing to have a petty extra care to avoid damaging the beat, they offer a great combination of warmth relative to their weight and able-bodied fit that's piece of cake to layer.
.jpg)
Midweight and Heavyweight
Down jackets in mid and heavyweight categories represent a significant step upwards in warmth from lightweight and ultralight models, and are intended for serious wintertime weather and uses like alpine climbing and mountaineering. Well-nigh notably, you'll see the fill weights go upwardly from the 3- to 4-ounce range (Patagonia Down Sweater) to 10.4 ounces (Mountain Equipment Lightline Eco) or more. They also are far puffier than the other categories with more than downwardly, and as a result take upwards quite a bit more than space in your pack. Because of this, we but bring them along if the extra warmth is absolutely necessary. We've included a number of our favorite mid and heavyweight options in this article, but for a deeper swoop into the market place, run into our round-upwards on the best winter jackets.
Warmth
It all starts with that lofty and premium warmth that can but be found in a down-filled product. Down insulation functions so effectively because the loose clusters of feathers are dandy at trapping body estrus. But different down sleeping bags, which have an official EN rating system that tests and measures their warmth on a concrete calibration, down jackets are more like the Wild West. Below is information that should help you make full in the gaps.
Fill Ability
Fill power (600-make full, 700-fill, 800-fill up, etc.) is how the quality of down is measured, and the higher the fill the better the down. The number is calculated based on how much space i ounce of downward clusters takes up in a cylindrical tube. This is known every bit the amount of loft, and the more loft a jacket has, the more body heat it traps and the warmer you will be. Put another manner, achieving the same corporeality of warmth with a lower make full ability requires more downward, adding weight and bulk to achieve the same comfort goals.
.jpg)
For jackets, 550 to 650-fill down is what yous'll find on almost entry and mid-level models, which is perfectly respectable for daily wear just falls short for performance use. Premium downward is 800-fill and above, which is what Arc'teryx, Patagonia, and Mountain Hardwear apply for their high-end downwards jackets. At this level of quality, y'all reap the highly touted benefits of downwards insulation: lightweight and ultra-compressible warmth. Some loftier-end climbing brands similar Feathered Friends and Montbell apply 900-fill downward, but that loftier of a number is a rarity and 800-fill is considered premium. In 2013, Patagonia experimented with a ane,000-make full down jacket, the Encapsil, but hasn't yet brought it dorsum to market place, and Montbell currently offers the 1,000-fill Plasma Downwardly Jacket and Parka with sparse 7D shells.
Fill Weight
Fill up power gets the most press, only fill up weight is possibly the most important factor in determining a down jacket's warmth. Fill weight is the actual amount of down blimp into a jacket, measured in ounces. For example, if Jacket A has vi ounces of 800-fill downward and Jacket B has three ounces of 800-fill downwardly, you can expect that Jacket A will be significantly warmer (we judge that it would increase condolement levels in low output activities by approximately 10-20 degrees). Lower fill power down offers less warmth per ounce, so to compare apples to apples you should use like fill powers.
Nosotros find it interesting that make full weight is much less publicized than fill power, which leads to a lot of confusion for shoppers who associate higher fill power as e'er pregnant more warmth. Apparently the fill ability numbers are far sexier, and as a result, we sometimes have to call the manufacturers to track downwardly fill weight every bit it's not always listed (for more information, see our article: Down Fill and Insulation Explained).
Our Estimated Temperature Scale
It's tough to pinpoint an verbal temperature range in which you lot will experience comfortable wearing a down jacket (there'south a reason no ane has attempted to create a standardized rating system). Factors like fit, layering, your levels of exertion and circulation, and wind all play a part.
Generally, nosotros think of downward sweaters and ultralights—which commonly have between 2 and 4 ounces of fill weight—equally providing solid warmth in conditions ranging from around 35 to 60 degrees Fahrenheit (ii to 15 degrees Celsius) with low levels of exertion, such as puttering around a army camp. More fill volition assistance y'all motion toward the lesser stop of the range and less will push yous toward the middle. A cozy baselayer tin buy you an actress 5 to 15 degrees depending on its thickness and quality. These types of jackets are very popular for iii-season alpine use and in cities for everything but the center of winter.
When the mercury drops beneath freezing, y'all will be more comfortable wearing a truthful midweight or heavyweight downwards jacket for winter. The fill weight of these jackets should be 4 ounces at the absolute minimum and oft is in the range of 5 to 6 ounces or more (the Outdoor Research Super Tall Down Parka, for instance, has more at 8.1 oz.). For bitter cold and climbing the highest peaks, an even heavier down parka may exist in club.
.jpg)
Weight
For uses like backpacking, climbing, mountaineering, ski touring, or whenever y'all have to lug around your ain gear, the total weight of your down jacket should play a significant office in your buying decision. Jackets like the Mountain Hardwear Ghost Whisperer/2 (8.eight oz.) and Feathered Friends Eos (10.half-dozen oz.) weigh very fiddling for the warmth they provide and compress downwards extremely small in your pack. Every bit a consequence of all the fun tech, they also cost considerably more than your typical down sweater. On the other hand, if yous simply demand a layer for around town and occasional outdoor uses similar downhill skiing, you'll be completely fine with a somewhat heavier and more affordable build similar the ane-pound-iv.7-ounce Outdoor Research Coldfront. Finally, wintertime-prepare jackets volition manifestly be the heaviest options, including the one-pound-15.8-ounce REI Stormhenge Down Hybrid.
.jpg)
"Ultralight" is a buzzword of sorts that you will inevitably run across when shopping for a downwardly jacket, and it's worth noting there aren't difficult-and-fast rules as to what qualifies. Nosotros keep a shut eye on the ratio of fill weight to total weight to see what lengths the manufacturer went to trim weight (the shell denier is a good hint too, and more on that below). At the extreme stop of the spectrum is Montbell's Plasma 1000, which packs 1.six ounces of down within a superlight four.viii-ounce package. When gear companies really prioritize cutting weight, yous'll meet changes to zippers, a trim fit, and a lack of pockets. Some even opt for a pullover fashion to cut out half of the zipper. No matter what the manufacturer names a jacket, keep a close eye on fill weight and full weight to make your own determination.
Shell Material Immovability (Denier)
Denier (D) is the measurement of the weight of a thread, and the lower the number the lighter the weight. A lower denier rating means the material is less durable and more prone to tears or punctures. Much of the difference in weight of an ultralight jacket is trimmed by using a lower denier fabric for the shell. Other factors like premium downwards (it provides the nigh warmth for the least amount of weight) and ultralight zippers play a role besides, only the beat material is most of import.
.jpg)
Almost every jacket on this listing is fabricated with reasonably lightweight trounce fabrics. The thinnest jacket is the Montbell Plasma g , which has a very delicate 7D shell, and the thickest (at least among those that report this spec) is the Mountain Equipment Lightline Eco, which has a 50D shell. 10D is pretty standard for ultralights, and a more than substantial 20D is what y'all'll frequently discover in an average downwards sweater. Don't underestimate the importance of denier: fifty-fifty the difference from 10D to 20D can play a significant role in the total weight and potential lifespan of your jacket. If ounces affair and yous intend to use the jacket in the backcountry, care for yourself to an ultralight. If well-nigh of your use will be in the urban center, a downwardly sweater is sturdier and should salve you coin in the process.
Compressibility and Packed Size
Downwardly enthusiasts honey its compressibility and for good reason. An ultralight jacket similar the Mountain Hardwear Ghost Whisperer/2 can be stuffed into its own pocket and end up much smaller than a Nalgene bottle. The tiny packed size means you take little reason to leave it behind, and can fit it hands into either a daypack or overnight backpacking pack.
Keep in mind that the higher the fill power the more easily it will compress. This is noticeable when you get into premium levels of downward (800-make full and higher up), which pack down to seemingly impossible sizes nevertheless bounce back later only a few minutes out of the purse (as long as yous don't store it compressed likewise long). Fabric thickness also plays an important part, and thinner denier fabrics logically pack down smaller. Along with warmth for the weight, compressibility is an expanse where down dominates the vast majority of synthetic-insulated jackets.
Hydrophobic Down and DWR Treatment
Down feathers unfortunately lose much of their ability to insulate when wet, turning into a clumpy and soggy mess. This makes them a serious liability in wet weather condition or if y'all're sweating heavily, which is why some adopt a synthetic jacket that continues to insulate when wet.
Present, a lot of gear manufacturers treat down to brand information technology more water resistant. They practise this past adding a polymer to the downwardly before filling the jacket, and the event is that it resists h2o better and yous don't have to worry as much almost light atmospheric precipitation. Even though it notwithstanding doesn't match the moisture atmospheric condition operation of synthetics, we love the hydrophobic downwards motility. If you're headed out in a moisture expanse like the Pacific Northwest or New Zealand, a jacket with hydrophobic down like the Ghost Whisperer/2 (and a waterproof shell) is a smart choice.
Another way that gear manufacturers fight wet is a DWR (durable water repellant) treatment on the exterior on the jacket. This treatment helps prevent h2o droplets from forming and entering your jacket—essentially the water has a harder fourth dimension staying on the textile and beads up and rolls off instead. Neither a DWR terminate nor hydrophobic down will keep your downward completely dry, but they make nice lines of defense against lite to moderate precipitation.
Fit
Fit is jacket-specific, but there are two primary considerations hither. Beginning, down sweaters have a more casual fit than ultralight or functioning jackets, including boxier torsos, arms, and hoods (when available). Fit also varies significantly by brand. From our feel, Arc'teryx jackets like the Cerium LT Hoody fit the slimmest of all, which we refer to just as the "Arc'teryx fit." Guides and ultra-athletic folks who frequently apply the gear are a key contingent for Arc'teryx, which helps explicate the fit. Nosotros also similar the athletic cuts on layers from Mount Equipment and Rab. Brands like Patagonia, Outdoor Enquiry, and Mount Hardwear often have more all-around shapes that residual everyday comfort with performance. And finally, we've institute that REI Co-op and Marmot autumn on the roomier stop of the spectrum, and nosotros occasionally need to size down (including with our REI 650 Downward Jacket two.0).
.jpg)
Hood or No Hood?
About down jackets on this list are offered in hooded and not-hooded versions. The non-hooded version is slightly cheaper and weighs less, but you don't become the advantage of the extra warmth and comfort. For casual apply or as a midlayer for skiing, many people opt for a down vest or become without the hood and carry a split beanie instead. For backpacking and climbing, many people get the hood and don't regret information technology. You'll discover that in our picks above, we listed down sweaters in the non-hooded versions (when available), which are the nearly commonly purchased, and the ultralights with hoods, also the virtually mutual for that variety of jacket. For a deeper dive into the topic, see our commodity: Does Your Down Jacket Need a Hood?.
Women's-Specific Down Jackets
This commodity is unisex in nature and we take both men and women gear testers getting outdoors in all seasons and types of conditions (and you'll find that whenever possible, product buttons are provided for both the men'due south and women's versions). In addition, we have created a round-up of the all-time women's-specific down jackets covering that category in particular. Many of the models are the same but the names and colorways sometimes vary. On occasion, a specific design feature or the fit will differ. And in that location are products that are only available for women or vice versa. Regardless, we hope that it's helpful for those who prefer to see how the women's-specific designs stack up.
What About Synthetic Jackets?
There is a lot to be said for synthetic insulated jackets, which insulate amend than downward when moisture, are more breathable, and cheaper. However, down all the same has no replacement (at least for now). The warmth-to-weight ratio is unparalleled, as are compressibility and comfort. We've tested a number of synthetic jackets like the Arc'teryx Atom LT and Patagonia Micro Puff, both are which are very comfortable and reasonably calorie-free, but the warmth just isn't the same. We ofttimes attain for synthetics for everyday use and light outdoor activities in the autumn and leap, but they take upwardly too much space in our packs for extended backcountry trips and most don't provide quite enough warmth for truly common cold days. Optimally you would have both, but if you're only in the market for a single jacket, there's simply no better insulator than downward. For a more detailed explanation of this topic, see our commodity on downward vs. synthetic insulation.
Dorsum to Our Pinnacle Down Jacket Picks Dorsum to Our Downward Jacket Comparison Table
Source: https://www.switchbacktravel.com/best-down-jackets
0 Response to "Lands End Mens 800 Down Packable Jacket Review"
Post a Comment